In 1997, Noted Einstein Scholars Leo Corry, Juergen Renn And John Stachel Attempted To Rewrite The History Of The Gravitational Field Equations Of The General Theory Of Relativity Their Radical Revisionism Was Largely Based On A Set Of Printer S Proofs Of An Important Paper By The World Famous Mathematician David Hilbert, In Which Hilbert Published The Field Equations Of General Relativity Five Days Before Einstein Copied Them From Hilbert Corry, Renn And Stachel Claimed That These Printer S Proofs Of Hilbert S Paper Did Not Contain The Equations Which Appeared In Hilbert S Final Published Paper However, In Their 1997 Article In The Journal Science, Belated Decision In The Hilbert Einstein Priority Dispute, Corry, Renn And Stachel Failed To Disclose The Fact That These Printer S Proofs Were Mutilated, And Are Missing A Critical Part The Very Part Which Contained The Equations Corry, Renn And Stachel Claimed Hilbert Did Not Know The Author Of Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist, Christopher Jon Bjerknes, Refutes The Baseless Historical Revisionism Of Corry, Renn And Stachel In His New Book Anticipations Of Einstein In The General Theory Of Relativity, And Proves That Einstein Did Not Originate Any Of The Major Concepts Of The General Theory Of Relativity By Comparing The Original Source Material By Einstein And His Predecessors Einstein Even Fudged His Equations In Order To Achieve The Results Others Had Published Long Before Him.
- 1 page
- Anticipations of Einstein in the General Theory of Relativity
- Christopher Jon Bjerknes
- 25 December 2017 Christopher Jon Bjerknes